Better interviews start before the interview.
Interview Intelligence drafts questions and behavioural prompts tailored to the candidate in front of you — grounded in their résumé, framed by the job, and always yours to approve.
- Technical · grounded in résuméWalk me through the Kafka-to-Kinesis migration you led at Acme. What did you underestimate?
- Behavioural · for this roleTell me about a time you disagreed with a technical direction. What did you do?
- Probe · thin evidenceRésumé mentions “on-call ownership” but no context — ask what that meant in practice.
Generic interviews produce generic answers.
The best interviews probe the specific gap between what the résumé claims and what the role requires. The worst interviews use the same six questions for every candidate, so every candidate sounds identical.
But writing tailored questions takes time. You have ten interviews next week. So you fall back on "tell me about a challenging project" — and the candidate rehearses the same answer they gave the last three interviewers.
Interviews should be an information-gathering exercise. Most aren't.
How Interview Intelligence works
For each candidate on your calendar, AROS drafts a short guide:
- 1Technical questions grounded in this candidate's actual work history
- 2Behavioural prompts targeting the traits your role requires
- 3Follow-up branches for likely answers
- 4Areas to probe where the résumé was vague
- 5Notes on what you already know so you don't waste interview time
Small surface, big signal.
“I once interviewed a candidate for 45 minutes and left knowing less than when we started. Not because the person was evasive — because I asked the same generic questions I asked everyone. Interview Intelligence exists because the résumé already told us where the interesting questions were. We just weren't reading it in time.”